Can Famous Musicians Giving Their New Album Away For Free Really Be Called Innovative?
The free release of U2's new album "Songs of Innocence" on iTunes for free may be dubbed innovative in some camps but, except for the potential reach, it's difficult to call a free giveaway of something lots of people will want innovative. But, though I don't see the free release as an innovative move for music, I do think U2's appearance, the theme of their album and the connection to their earlier release on the iPod made their participation in Apple's event a nice older but wiser, back for a fresh start moment for both parties.
Daniel Kreps at Rolling Stone covers "15 Innovative Album Releases That Shook the Music Industry." It got me thinking about whether or not U2's release of "Songs of Innocence" for free on iTunes could be called innovative.
Without getting too picky about definitions let's say, for the sake of this post, that to be innovative one must make a fresh creative move that isn't just a bigger version of what came before.
In that sense U2 follows in the footsteps of Jay Z's Samsung album giveaway and Beyoncé's surprise release of "In Rainbows" via iTunes. It basically combines them and distinguishes the move by likely being the largest free album release in history.
See how the innovation factor fades and we start to get into Guinness World Book territory?
However Daniel Kreps, to his credit, doesn't actually call this new release innovative. He does remind us of the 2004 special edition iPod with U2's entire discography as well as a copromotion for their new album which did feel like an innovative partnership at the time.
And that's what made yesterday's partnership between Apple and U2 a nice event.
Both have won quite a bit and lost some as well. Both face serious challenges. And both need fresh beginnings and big sales.
More:
- Garth Brooks Promised Something Special, Instead He Launched GhostTunes
- So How Did The Samsung, Jay-Z Partnership Turn Out?
- How Beyoncé Impacted Pop With Surprise Album
Hypebot Senior Contributor Clyde Smith (@fluxresearch) recently launched DanceLand. Send news about music tech startups and services, DIY music biz and music marketing to: clyde(at)fluxresearch(dot)com.
What makes you think U2 and Jay-Z gave anything away for ‘free’?
We don’t know how many millions U2 were paid, but it was probably more than the $5m Samsung paid Jay-Z for his 1m albums.
They did, after all, sell 5oom copies.
Of course they got paid.
I’m obviously talking about free to the end user.
Try to stay focused.
Giving stuff away for free is a trick. Makes you think if this stuff is good, how much better is paid stuff.
So you buy.